That user interface that you see? It's laid out using a markup language like XUL (not unlike Microsoft's XAML, and both bear resemblances to HTML), styled using CSS, and programmed using JavaScript. Phoenix uses the exact same core/engine (Gecko) as Suite-Mozilla products run using the same core rendering engine that is used for web content. Then a group of developers decided to create a new project called Phoenix (because it's Mozilla reborn) where they took Suite and started to strip out everything that wasn't related to the browser (so no e-mail client, no editor, etc.), simplified the UI (hacked out a ton of menu items, simplified the options, etc.). It was called the Mozilla Suite, and for a while, the Suite was Mozilla's flagship product. So when Netscape gave way to Mozilla, things started out as a single big program that did everything and had a gazillion different features and options all rolled into one. The Netscape 4 Communicator suite was a browser, an e-mail client, a newsgroup reader, and a WYSIWYG HTML editor, all rolled up into one big happy package. Let me know what you think after you’ve tried it out.Back before Mozilla, in the days of Netscape 4, the fad was to have a big all-in-one package. And best of all, you’ll notice a significant boost in performance. If you use Pale Moon, you may have to wait awhile to enjoy significant improvements made by Mozilla, but you’ll be spared the annoyance of frequent upgrades. He says he won’t race to keep up with every new iteration of Firefox, but will adopt important new features as they come out, while maintaining “a familiar set of controls and visual feedback similar to previous versions, including grouped navigation buttons of a decent size, a bookmarks toolbar that is enabled by default, and not in the least a functional status bar.” Straver is one of those irritated users, but unlike you and me, he can actually do more about it than complain. And of course, it’s certain that some add-ons won’t work, particularly on the 64-bit version.Īs you may recall, the Mozilla organization has been rapidly pushing new releases of Firefox onto the Web, a rapid pace that has irritated quite a few users. Pale Moon also drops support for Internet Explorer’s ActiveX and ActiveX scripting technology, which offers a security benefit, but also means that some Web content won’t display if you try to view it with Pale Moon. I suspect that someone running the 32-bit version of the browser on a 32-bit version of Windows would find it even slower than I did.įor the sake of better performance, Straver left out some features, notably parental controls and accessibility tools that some people may miss. For comparison, I downloaded a 32-bit version as well, and noticed it looked identical, but was a tad slower. If you have a 64-bit version of Windows 7, there is a version of Pale Moon tailored for it, and that’s the one I’m running. Pale Moon runs very well on Windows 7, but I could not get it to run on my backup Vista machine, although documentation on the browser’s Web site says it is supposed to run on Windows versions as far back as XP. If your PC has an AMD processor you’ll have to download a separate version. Indeed, it won’t run on older PCs, or on computers running Linux or other operating systems. Unlike Firefox and other popular browsers, Pale Moon was designed with Windows and new generations of Intel processors in mind. Beware the 9 warning signs of bad IT architecture and see why these 10 old-school IT principles still rule.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |